Sports Business Shifts: Michigan AD, NHL Media, SEC Unrest

Four stories landed on Tuesday that, taken separately, are each worth a morning's attention. Taken together, they sketch something larger: the structural renegotiation happening simultaneously across nearly every layer of American sport — institutional, financial, and political.

Michigan's Open Seat

Warde Manuel informed Michigan's president this week that he intended to step down as athletic director at the end of 2026, and the university accepted. Per the Detroit Free Press, Manuel — who held the role since 2016 and whose most recent contract ran through June 2030 — will leave roughly three and a half years before that term expires.

The timing is not incidental. The university simultaneously released findings from an independent athletics review, conducted by an outside law firm and initiated last year in connection with the firing of football coach Sherrone Moore. The investigation's conclusions were, in SBJ's Abe Madkour's framing, a mixed verdict: Manuel "demonstrated important leadership strengths, particularly his commitment to student athletes," but the review also found "weakness in accountability and organizational structure and oversight" and "conditions in which misconduct was not always addressed consistently or promptly."

That is the kind of report that makes a position structurally untenable regardless of the subject's actual merits. Michigan is not a forgiving environment — strong board, demanding alumni base, a football program that generates outsized revenue and outsized scrutiny in equal measure. Manuel has been in that crossfire since well before the Moore situation.

He came to the role as someone with deep roots in the institution — a former defensive lineman under Bo Schembechler in the 1980s. That history likely extended his runway. It probably could not extend it indefinitely.

As Madkour noted, the vacancy "will be a popular job. There'll be many big names looking to land this role." That is almost certainly correct. Michigan's athletic department generates substantial revenue, sits inside one of the country's largest public university systems, and carries national visibility that most AD positions cannot match. The search will be watched.

The Production Consolidation Wave

The business logic of centralized sports media production is not complicated: regional sports networks have been collapsing for years, the distribution environment is fractured, and leagues that depend on local broadcast for fan engagement — and for the contractual obligations that come with franchise ownership — cannot simply wait for a market solution that is not arriving.

The NHL's answer, formalized this week, is NHL Productions — an in-house production hub that will handle local telecasts for the Columbus Blue Jackets, St. Louis Blues, Carolina Hurricanes, and Minnesota Wild beginning this October. The timing connects directly to the closure of Main Street Sports Group's regional sports networks, which had been carrying those games. The investment, per Madkour, runs "nearly eight figures" spread across three seasons, with the division covering game production, studio programming, and technical engineering support.

What makes this noteworthy beyond the immediate four-team scope is the pattern it confirms. Major League Baseball already handles local broadcasts for 14 clubs. The NBA is targeting a centralized hub launch for the 2027-28 season. Each league is building its own infrastructure rather than a shared cross-league system — Madkour noted there had once been talk of a multi-league centralized platform, but that conversation has apparently not materialized into action.

The unresolved question, which Madkour put plainly, is distribution: "How do people access these games? Is there one hub like ESPN Unlimited or YouTube where you could watch all of these games, or will it just be more regionally focused and sell distribution to a local or regional carrier?" Production capacity is the solvable problem. Getting the content in front of the fan, at a price point that works, through a platform they already use — that remains genuinely open.

Sankey Says the Quiet Part

SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey used football media days to confirm something that has been circulating as subtext for years: the conference has had real conversations about separating from the NCAA structure entirely.

To his credit, Sankey was careful about framing. This is "not the preferred solution of the conference leaders." It is a contingency that has entered actual dialogue with school presidents and chancellors, not a threat being lobbed at a press conference. The issues driving that dialogue are familiar — congressional legislation, NIL governance, eligibility rules, the College Football Playoff's structure — but the weight Sankey placed on the conversation is new.

"The SEC is frustrated with the NCAA's handling of a lot of these issues," Madkour summarized, "and not just the NCAA per se, but the collegiate ecosystem as a whole." The Protect College Sports Act, the current vehicle for federal NIL legislation, has the conference's attention but not its full support. Sankey indicated ongoing dialogue aimed at reshaping the bill, while declining to predict whether it passes.

The drip, as Madkour called it, continues. The SEC has leverage that no other conference can credibly claim — revenue, brand, political relationships, and a football footprint that makes it effectively irreplaceable within any governance structure it chooses to occupy. Whether that leverage gets exercised as a genuine departure or functions primarily as negotiating pressure is a different question, and one Sankey left carefully unanswered.

FIFA's Four-Year Ledger

FIFA president Gianni Infantino has told member association representatives that the organization expects to top $15 billion in revenue across the current four-year cycle — a figure that encompasses the 2026 World Cup, the Club World Cup, and the 2023 Women's World Cup. FIFA's most recent internal projection for the same cycle was $13 billion, meaning the organization would end up roughly $2 billion ahead of forecast if the estimate holds.

Worth holding onto the framing here: $15 billion is a cycle figure, not a single-tournament figure. The number circulating in some coverage as a World Cup revenue total is a different, narrower claim. Madkour flagged this explicitly on Tuesday's broadcast. The headline is still strong — exceeding a $13 billion projection by $2 billion is a meaningful overperformance — but the context matters for anyone doing comparative analysis.

On the venue side, AT&T Stadium in Dallas hosted nine games, more than any other venue in the tournament. Mexico City recorded the highest average per-game attendance of any host city. The appetite that tournament produced in Mexico City is not lost on U.S. league operators who have spent years debating whether a franchise there is viable. The World Cup provided a useful data point.

Flag Football's Operator

TMRW Sports — the Tiger Woods and Rory McIlroy venture that has since expanded into flag football in partnership with the NFL — has named Brendan Donohue as the first president of its flag football league. Per NBA.com, Donohue spent close to three decades across NBA teams and the league office, including a stint as president of the NBA 2K League and senior vice president at NBA TeamMkt. He has been managing director at Elevate Talent since January 2025.

The hire has a notable backstory: TMRW Sports retained Elevate Talent in April to lead the search for the flag football league's top executive. Donohue, already in that role at the search firm, apparently entered the process himself. He ended up as the candidate. You could read that as a conflict of interest resolved cleanly, or as a search process that surfaced exactly the right person — depending on your priors about how these things tend to work.

What's unambiguous is the resume fit. Donohue has launched entities from a standing start within established institutional frameworks, which is precisely what a nascent flag football league backed by NFL capital requires. The league is targeting a launch next year with NFL backing and a significant investor roster. The organizational infrastructure is now, at least nominally, in place.

The more durable question is whether flag football — as a professional spectator product rather than a participation sport — can develop the kind of audience engagement that justifies the capital being committed to it. The NFL's involvement provides legitimacy and distribution muscle. Neither of those things, by themselves, creates fans.

---

Marcus Tate is the Sports Desk Editor at Buzzrag, covering the business of professional and collegiate athletics.